Short Film Review - "Different"

 

“Different” – A Short Film Directed by Tahneek Rahman (2019)

 

Tahneek describes his short film, worded by discoverology, about “A deaf girl comes across a boy who is paralyzed from the waist-down, but neither of them knows about each other’s differences.” (s.d.) The setup of this five-minute short film introduces the main two characters, Emily and Sam, in an outdoor setting who are both clearly unaware of each other’s differences unlike the spectators. This can already begin to create an external conflict as it can create awkwardness and tension not just for the spectators, but the characters themselves. As the opening continues, the spectators gain an insight into Emily’s feelings about Sam (exposition) and how she wants the friendship to grow; shown when Emily repeatedly chucks different notes down the back of Sam’s top, midway through her runs.

Later, Emily falls off her skateboard in front of Sam, arguably to grab his attention away from what he was doing, onto her. This can be the inciting incident that initiates their connection, however, when Emily falls off, Sam is quick to ask, “Yo, are you okay?” but Emily freaks out when he doesn’t physically help her up. This creates a further conflict between the two characters due to Emily’s misunderstanding and judgement about Sam, who is unable to walk. Emily is now assuming Sam is rude, yet she is clearly mistaken. As a spectator, we don’t necessarily align with either of the main characters (protagonists), as the main goal within this short film is about the connection that Emily and Sam have, and to not let their differences interfere to make their friendship work. Contrasting to this, it is possible for viewers to take the intended message and agree with it even without a disability as everyone has differences in one way or another.

After Emily runs off due to her embarrassment, described by the narrator, she looks through a bush back at Sam. This is where Sam is to be seen getting help back into his wheelchair which is the climax, as it is the point in the story where Emily now realises, she has made a mistake and arguably regretting her decision for running off. Personally, it was difficult to separate the climax to the falling action, as the falling action could also be Emily’s new awareness and understanding about Sam being paralyzed from the waist down.  In other films, this could cause confusion as it is not obviously following a three-act structure, yet personally I think it works well as Emily’s emotions of guilt, and even shame, come through more intensely providing that heightened investment towards the short film.

As the resolution at the end of the short film appears, Emily and Sam are both sat back on the bench with each-other, creating this cyclical structure but only with a different interaction. Sam hands Emily two pieces of paper, then signs “Sorry” to her. This form of communication, sign language, only escalates the meaning that Rahman wanted to originally create and stated, ““With this film, I wanted to share a message that despite our differences, we can all still live in a world where we can work together for the greater good.” (2018) Sam changes his actions once understanding Emily’s difference to make their friendship at an equilibrium. This ending feels complete as both characters, but especially Emily, get what they wanted which is to start a friendship. Moreover, this ending is happy due to the characters possibly also getting what they both have needed; for someone not to judge them based on their differences and to accept them for who they are.

Throughout “Different” Rahman has chosen to use a narrator to describe the action and emotions of the two characters. The narrator could possibly bring a sense of security to the spectators understanding of the narrative so there are no misjudgements happening, just like what happened between Emily and Sam. Personally, I wonder how the impression would have changed be there no narrator. Would it be more emotional? Would it have been perceived the same way? Or would it simply make no difference at all? I think that it would be interesting to not have a narrator for this short film, as it encourages the spectator to read the characters themselves, positioning themselves in the situation of Emily and Sam. Despite this, the use of the narrator aids the spectator to stay more on track with the structure and adds more depth to the story as they are almost saying what Emily and Sam wish they could say to each-other.

Bibliography:

https://discoverology.com/different-award-winning-short-film/ (12/10/2021)

https://lncspotlight.wordpress.com/2018/02/28/different-an-award-winning-short-film-by-tahneek-rahman/ (12/10/2021)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu24PZIbkoY (12/10/2021)

 

 

Comments